250 a Month!

The iPad models that come with Wi-Fi and 3G will let users choose, on a month-by-month basis, whether to pay AT&T for 3G data service at one of two service levels. The unlimited plan is $29.99 per month, just like the iPhone's data fee; the 250 MB per month plan (combined upload and download) is just $14.99 per month. Will that suffice?

via db.tidbits.com

I too didn't think 250 MB a month would be enough until I looked at my own iPhone usage data … since I got my 3G I have averaged less than 100 MBs a month in usage. I am sure there are months when I use more than 100, but 250? The crazy thing is that I keep wifi off most of the time because of the VPN issues I have at Penn State. I think I can manage on 250MB a month. That is a huge surprise to me.

Lost in the Hype?

When the date for the announcement was set, I started hoping that Apple would release something like iWork for the “tablet.” I doubted they would so soon but the hope was there. As I figured, if they did, they’d be sending a clear message that this was the future of computing, not just for gaming, watching videos and reading books.

via northtemple.com

The inclusion of mobile versions of iWork were the thing that convinced me I could actually use this thing for real work — not just the stuff I use my iPhone for. The inclusion of Keynote is what makes the iPad so attractive to me. To be honest, Keynote is really the only piece of desktop software I use … I do a lot of talks and I've not been able to switch to Google Presenter which is funny given I use web services for everything else.

Real Life Social

The iPad is real-life social in a way that a phone and a laptop just aren't. You really can just hand it to someone to show them what you mean: share photos, videos, writing with real people right next to you. I can see using it to learn with a child, share pictures with my mother, discuss house remodeling, and many other tasks normally done with paper.

In the office, the iPad offers a middle-ground I've found lacking in electronic devices. Bringing my laptop into meetings puts up a screen between me and others, is a hassle to unplug and carry around, and can be personally distracting. Taking my iPhone to make notes makes people think I'm bored of the meeting and sending text messages to friends instead. So normally I choose paper, and tend to lose my notes afterwards.

The iPad is a device that will find fans not only in a family setting, but in a creative setting where collaboration and comment is in person. Criticized for not being open because of digital rights management, the iPad is actually very open, in the sense that it erects few physical barriers to sharing.

via radar.oreilly.com

I like the idea of "real life social," but I depend so much on the web for much of my social networks. I am really lucky that I do work in a place that I like the people I am with and that it is relatively open and social. I wonder how it plays out in a situation like what @Robin2Go wrote about yesterday? We are living in such splintered social times. All of these conversations are really interesting to me.

I do like the idea Edd mentions in that second paragraph … laptops and cell phones in meetings have not only become the norm, but a huge crutch. With an iPad I wonder if we'll see the birth of shorter standing meetings — where we can get together with our devices and never even have to sit down — just get to business and show each other our ideas. I have no idea, but not having my colleagues hiding behind screens may be an interesting change brought about by devices like iPad.

Third Revolution

But I don’t think the iPad heralds the death of the personal computer or, as many people seem somewhat strangely concerned about, the end of tinkering. It’s not as though the iPad is going to murder curiosity. Some complain that Apple keeps locking out the jailbreakers with every revision of the iPhone OS, but the key point there is that the jailbreakers keep finding a way in. Cars are harder to tinker with today, but that hasn’t stopped people from becoming mechanics. It’s just that the vast majority of people don’t care how it works under the hood, as long as it gets them from point A to point B.

via www.macworld.com

I've been spending lots of time talking to many friends about this device and like I said previously, I think the people most irritated about the shortcomings of the iPad are technology people. Maybe we all need to play a little wait and see.

I was lucky enough to get a 128k Mac for my 12th birthday back in the day and it was instantly usable. Funny thing is that it didn't multitask at all … I could only do one thing at a time. The thing that made it work was that the one thing I could do was simply amazing. I was a 12 year old who had never really used a computer for any real amount of time prior to unboxing and hooking up my Mac myself … it was so elegant in its design that I wanted to push it to the limits of what it could do. The power was in the way I used it. If I remember correctly, real computer users rilled the original Mac for being underpowered and a toy.

I am looking forward to seeing if the iPad does indeed provide the same kind of inspiration that my original Mac did. I don't know because I've not had anything like it before.

Harvard on Foursquare

“Universities are places of such incredible talent and energy,” said Dennis Crowley, foursquare’s co-founder. â€œAnd that is why we’re excited about Harvard’s participation and the potential for foursquare to bring people together.”

via news.harvard.edu

This is another example of how partnerships can work … Harvard didn't go out and invent a location based social networking game, they went to people who do that really well. What did Harvard bring to the table? Community.

Flash Forward?

What’s Hulu going to do? Sit there and wait? Whine about the blue boxes? Or do the practical thing and write software that delivers video to iPhone OS? The answer is obvious. Hulu doesn’t care about what’s good for Adobe. They care about what’s good for Hulu. Hulu isn’t a Flash site, it’s a video site. Developers go where the users are.

via daringfireball.net

I know we (in higher ed) rely on Flash for lots of stuff. Are we ready to pay attention to the shifts happening under our feet?

Progress is Hard

First, I would put the birth of New World computing at 2007, with the introduction of the iPhone. You could even arguably stretch it a bit further back to the birth of “Web 2.0” applications in the early 2000s. But it’s brand new. If computers in general are young, New World computing is fresh out of the womb, covered in blood and screaming.

via stevenf.tumblr.com

This is how things change. The iMac killed the floppy and all the other legacy ports we *had to have* only to introduce a brand new way of thinking about connectivity. The iPhone destroyed my own notion of what I needed in a platform and the iPad is currently destroying (that is in the present progressive tense for a reason) the idea of the "desktop metaphor." I am daring people to say it isn't the right direction.

Alan Kay and the Dynabook

“This note speculates about the emergence of personal, portable information manipulators and their effects when used by both children and adults. Although it should be read as science fiction, current trends almost guarantee that many of the notions discussed will actually happen in the near future.” — Alan C. Kay, 1972

If you are interested in how the future is made, this is a worthwhile read. I’m betting at least few people at Apple did.