B2 Evolution … Multi Blogger Solution?

As I’ve noted before, we are looking for multi user blogging systems … I’ve gotten b2 evolution running and so far seems like a great solution. It has some really nice features, but I haven’t heard too much about it from the community. There are lots of people looking at these types of systems and I haven’t heard of many people talking about it. After I get it working the way I want it to, I’ll post more. For now, if anyone has experience with this version of b2, leave a comment. Thanks.

Blog Survey … Some Early Insight

I had posted quite a while back that Bart and I had conducted a small study at the end of last semester related to the use of the class blog in my IST 110 course. We’re getting our results together and I wanted to share a few things with you about it. The slide images are a little small, but you should be able to see what is going on. If you want more information, feel free to contact me directly, or leave comments. I’m not going to comment on these yet … I think they speak for temselves.

We received 37 total responses for this out of a class of 42. One thing to note was that I posted a considerable amount of content on the class blog (several posts per week) and students were only asked to respond to a single, graded Discussion Activity every week. They decided if they wanted to comment on my general posts.

The first image shows students’ reactions to blogs vs. message boards as educational tools. The second image shows students’ reactions to the fact that comments are fully visible without a need to navigate a message board hierarchy to read other posts and if that helps them organize their thoughts prior to posting. The final image shows their reaction to the motivational impact of seeing other posts had on them.

blog v mb

reading others

motivate

Seems like an interesting start to this … lots more stuff to plow through, but it is coming together nicely. I will continue to post updates.

Timing: blogs@ist.psu.edu

I read D’Arcy Norman’s post about getting a school-wide blogging service going and really couldn’t believe it. Seems we are on the same page. I have been pushing my group on the blog front for months — since last spring really. He does a great job laying some much needed groundwork … and then tonight I stumble across this post over at incorporated subversion and I am starting to think there is a paper here that would help a lot of people figure this thing out (at least a well executed blogsite).

I sat on the University-wide committee that selected (not passing any judgment on the selection, but …) ANGEL as our course management system and we used some well created matrices that outlined our needs, the tools on the market, and how it all aligned. I have been looking for something like that for multi-user blog tools and haven’t been able to find it. It looks like the need is very timely and there seems to be other interested people out there. I’d help work on something like that if anyone is interested.

We want to create an environment that allows faculty (at first) to create and manage their course blog sites. It has been a requested service by a few of our early adopters, but we haven’t gone after it yet. We did build some basic blogging functionality into the version 2.0 release of our Edison Services toolset, but pulled it at the last minute in favor of putting the horse back in front of the cart and collecting some requirements. I’d really like to have something in place by fall 2005, so we’ll see.

We have been able to automate a standard WordPress installation via a web interface that faculty can use, but it would become an administrative nightmare very quickly. Every install requires its own database and there isn’t any sort of way to upgrade all 160 faculty members’ blog spaces on the fly. I can only imagine what a bitch that would turn into. I love WordPress and am very excited to see the multi-user version! At any rate, we need a solid set of recommendations that match up to the needs of higher education. Let’s get it done … anyone want to help?

I Had An Interesting Meeting Today …

I had a great meeting today with the principles in The Institute for Information Policy (IIP) here at PSU about how to enhance their web presence. It was interesting because these guys are all heavy hitters in their collective spaces … they are also very well respected by their peers both on our campus and in the international space. What blew my mind was how much they knew about the web and at the same time, how excited they got when we started to talk about the powers of CMS tools, RSS, and other “newerish” items they hadn’t really heard of.

At the moment, they have a grad student (who doesn’t?) designing and updating their site. They went over their goals with me … “make it look nicer and easier to use” is what they said. But when I was digging deeper, I discovered that they also wanted the ability to share more up to date news, connect with peers, raise their google rankings, write and publish their own content, understand who was showing up at their site, etc … they didn’t really know it, but they have some fairly serious needs and they came around to the idea that Dreamweaver isn’t going to cut it for them. I showed them Mambo and we talked about how critical it is that they have more control over their content and have the ability to update it quickly … what got them the most excited was the whole RSS concept. They just loved the idea of being able to syndicate their own content and were even more excited to be able to subscribe to other Research Center’s materials. The problem is, when we looked further, we discovered that all the other Research Centers they pointed me to don’t have RSS feeds and are pretty much static sites. It gave them an idea that they could actually jump to the head of the class in their space with a well-designed site. It was cool to see.

It was really just a chance meeting in that I rarely meet with faculty about technologies like web sites and stuff … I am usually more tied to the larger mission critical stuff we do in the Institute … but, I have been anxious to get a couple of the heavier hitting faculty at PSU interested in using some of these technologies so I spent the time with them. Well worth it. I felt like a salesman and actually caught myself getting excited about the nuts and bolts of it all.

What I was hoping for was a group of faculty who want to push the limits of the technology … What I got was a group that really got into it and are more than willing to both along for the ride and help drive! They all walked away feeling like the curtain had been pulled back on web technologies and they were seeing for the first time that, “hey we can do that!” That’s what I’d like to be able to create on a more regular basis — opportunities for faculty to take complete ownership over their IP and have the power to publish and push it. Sorts of laughs in the face of the traditional back office technologist who honestly believes that they must control it all … just not my style I guess. Have others had similar experiences with faculty getting on board and being jacked by being able to regain control over their use of technology?

Tagging Content? Next Generation LMS …

There is so much going on all across the web as it relates to social networking, user centered content, and tagging that I can’t help but think a next generation LMS/CMS is sitting right under our noses. I have been giving the whole content delivery for education and training quite a bit of thought lately and I am really moving towards building a system that shifts the focus to the student and allows them a very open environment for learning and collaborating — all from within a single environment.

I think we made some good steps towards a more faculty centered approach with the Edison Services 2.0 release last fall, but how has it helped students? Sure, we have created a more efficient way for students to get at content, announcements, and other course related information, but it is still more faculty driven. I have been using WordPress from some time now and I really believe there is a new suite of tools sitting right around the corner — all built on the WordPress engine. The question isn’t when will we see it, but how much of the popular web should be included?

Thinking about tagging and what goes on over at flickr has me wondering if the whole concept of folksonomies should make its way into an eLearning space … I mean, what a better way for students to write, create, and share knowledge. If they can create and then tag their work so that it falls within some sort of community construct that makes sense within the contextual framework of the course, then let’s go! This from a Wired article I read this morning:

“The job of tags isn’t to organize all the world’s information into tidy categories,” said Stewart Butterfield, one of Flickr’s co-founders. “It’s to add value to the giant piles of data that are already out there.”

Looks to me like a whole host of sites — the popular ones with the early adoption crowd — are using this type of tagging to build community and to create user centered structure … sites like delicious are taking it to a whole new level … consider this, also from the Wired article and you’ll hopefully see that our eLearning environments ignore this new approach to web content delivery:

“It’s very much people tagging information so that they can come back to it themselves or so that others with the same vocabulary can find it,” said Thomas Vander Wal, the information architect credited with coining the term “folksonomy.”

“To me, they’re a great new organization tool for applications and large content sites,” said Matt Haughey, the founder of MetaFilter. “Tags are great because you throw caution to the wind, forget about whittling down everything into a distinct set of categories and instead let folks loose categorizing their own stuff on their own terms.”

Now we have to do what we did years ago … take the good from the bleeding edge and get it integrated into our technology. The great thing is that the open source community has built us a base to create the new approaches. I’ll be exploring them more in the coming days and weeks. Let me know what you think.

Open Source CMS Tools

Now that I have spent the better part of six weeks exploring different php/mySQL CMS packages, I have decided to write a short paper comparing them. I will attempt to pull in some interesting points to base my comparisons on and establish a set of model outcomes I used as a guide when I set out on this quest. I will look mainly at WordPress, Mambo, and Drupal … all of which are excellent tools in their own right. I have found, however, they all serve similar but different needs. I’ll be working on it the next couple of weks and will post it here when I am finished … look for updates along the way.

I would also like to collect some user feedback, so if any of you have experience with these three tools, please post a comment. I am hopeful that this paper will serve as a basic “jumping off” point for others looking to utilize these tools in the educational space.

New Ideas

I hate to say it, but I feel like I am just “getting” the open source community … I’ve known its there, but I’ve never really taken the time to look at all it really has to offer. That all changed this week when I set out to create a new domain for another project … I didn’t want to set up a standard site for it. I wanted it to be a standards-oriented open source blog space. I’ve been looking at several things, but I settled on WordPress. It is a great toolset.

The thing that really amazes me is that it is free — free to download, free to use, free to use for other reasons, free to make money on, free to base new products on, just flat out free. And it just works … I mean I was able to make it work in a bout five minutes … mySQL, PHP, and everything! It took me another day to get it all looking close to what I wanted, but still easy. I am beginning to see a powerful opportunity here … I know I am late to the party.

When I stopped to think about it, this software could easily be the basis to a whole new toolset. The new hosting company I went with has a whole suite of open source tools that can be installed and running with just a couple clicks from a somewhat easy to use central interface. Really eye opening … there isn’t anything like it in higher ed — competition makes a huge difference. I am going to see what it would take to turn several open source tools into a great product … At any rate, I think I am about 70% to a solution to something I’ve been trying to figure out for years … and its all free.

Driving Adoption: The Edison Services Way

As the Solutions Institute prepares to rollout version 2.0 of our Edison Services toolset we are asking ourselves, “how do we get faculty to use it?” We went through a similar adoption and dissemination effort about four years ago when we started rolling out the first Online IST courses. As the chart below indicates, we were very successful in getting faculty to start using the course materials. It was a lot of good old fashioned leg work that got the ball rolling – visiting different PSU campuses around the Commonwealth, lots of face time with faculty in workshops, and other “high touch” kinds of events.

Adoption

With this Edison rollout things are different. We aren’t really pushing it like we did with Online IST … it is a different approach and it is a different toolset than courseware. What we are attempting to do now is create something that supports all forms of teaching and learning, innovates in a space that desperately needs it, and really just enables new ways to build community around the concept of teaching and learning with technology. Our goals with Online IST included creating a consistent and quality learning experience at the core of the IST curriculum and build a next generation learning environment that students would actually enjoy using. I think we did that and students seemed happy and faculty adopted the technology. With Edison 2.0, we are trying to get EVERYONE within IST, not just a subset, to use it as the central hub to his or her digital teaching and learning life. The graph below indicates our hopes for adoption over the next several years.

projection

The idea is to make sure every faculty member uses technology for teaching and learning purposes in an appropriate and dynamic fashion. Let’s be honest, part of what we are doing is trying to get students excited about our curriculum … higher education has become a very competitive environment … with budgets as tight as they are its very important to land good students and keep enrollment strong. With that in mind, the entire experience of taking an IST class needs to be as exciting as it possibly can be. One thing our students demand is good utilization of technology in the classroom and by them starting their experience with access to a next generation suite of tools that can support their learning goes a long way towards convincing them that IST faculty know what they’re doing.

I just read an article in the Chronicle of Higher Education today that discusses student’s views of technology in the classroom. What I found interesting was that of the nearly 4,400 students surveyed, nearly 50% said that the biggest benefit of classroom technology is convenience, while only 13% said that improved learning was taking place … What Edison aims at primarily is that convenience factor … but, with keeping an eye on improving the way faculty structure a teaching with technology experience. One of our primary goals with Edison was to streamline and improve the teaching and learning experience for both students and faculty. We wanted faculty to be able to very quickly create cutting edge teaching experiences and we wanted to empower students with features that other LMS/CMS tools just can’t deliver.

But what this entry is really about is adoption. How do we get faculty to recognize the value in the toolset and to take the time to explore and ultimately deliver their materials via Edison? Furthermore, how do we get students to demand an experience like the one they can only get from Edison? Well, to answer the first, we’ll go directly to our faculty, put them through some usability testing, ask them what they want, and teach them how to use the tools. Hopefully they will see the value, understand how this will help them (higher ratings and better perceived quality of delivery), and become strong supporters of the technology. Back when we rolled out Online IST, we picked two or three key members of the faculty as pilot testers and then let them do the selling to the rest of the group – that worked and we’ll do it again. As for student adoption, well, that will have to wait until faculty begin to really use it. When edison 2.5 rolls out for the Spring semester the community tools will be ready and I think students will begin to demand having it available in all their classes.

For now, its back to the good old fashioned leg work to get them to show up on August 15th for the rollout … until then, we can only plan for a good release. If you have ideas, I know we’d love to hear them!